One feature of WPF that I always liked was the D3DImage class in WPF. It allowed you to render any Direct3D surface to WPF airspace. This came in handy for when the retained mode XAML system (or WPF 3D) was not not flexible enough. This opened up a wide range of opportunities in the user interface, such as hardware accelerated video, and high quality 3D graphics. Windows Phone 7 also has a similar feature, where in Silverlight you can mix XNA and XAML in the same user interface.
At the time of this writing, the new Windows 8 Metro XAML user interface, (which is prerelease) that feature is missing at the moment. You can make a Direct3D11 Metro application or a XAML application. No mixing allowed. As an intermediate solution I wanted to take a crack on what can be done about this. Here’s a quick video of the result, with apologies for my crappy camera.
How does this work?
Before I get anyone too excited, let me just say it involves a GPU read-back to system memory. Yeah, I know it’s not optimal, but it’s better than nothing . Now that we got that out of the way…
If you aren’t having hurdles to jump over, then you aren’t using pre-beta software.
I was going to be writing this in C++ for a number of reasons, so I spent a good amount of time reading the MSDN documents. I was happy to see there was a WriteableBitmap class as at least this will let us render pixels. My excitement dwindled when I found the WriteableBitmap::PixelBuffer property returned an IBuffer. Why does this stink? IBuffer only has two properties, “Capacity” and “Length”. There doesn’t seem to be a “GetBuffer” method. After some digging I found some examples of how to do this in C# by using some WinRT extension methods. This was little help because I was doing this in C++. I decided I needed a little desperation, so I pulled out reflector to see how .NET was getting the pixel buffer. Low and behold, there is an undocumented interface! Here is the COM interface I rewrote in native:
Ready for pixels!
Now that we had a way to update the WriteableBitmap we needed pixels. With my sheer amount of weekend laziness, I decided to just hack up one of the Direct3D11 Metro samples. To make one of these samples work, I only had to do a minimal amount of changes. Most notably moving all the code to WinRT DLL, removing all swap chain code and replacing it with an ID3D11Texture2D. I had a few other pain-points with “Content” in WinRT DLLs, but I figure it’s my ignorance or pre-beta blues.
Like I said before, we’re downloading the texture from video memory to system memory, just to be copied and sent back to the GPU…so there is a performance hit. In my testing I’ve seen around 40 – 55 FPS. We can probably increase performance a little more with maybe a few more tricks.
Codes. Shut up and gimme codes!
You can download the code example here.
Included is a reusable D3DRenderer control that you can use from C++ or C# and sample application.
Have fun…and I assume no liability.